Years of deforestation and other unsustainable industrial practices rightfully have left us concerned about these global forests and lands, and the wildlife that inhabit them. Many brands and supply chains are doing their part to step up and address this.
Thankfully, in the United States, widespread deforestation is not common. We can thank regulations and ethical best practices set forth by the U.S. industry, conservation organizations and government alike. But there are still wildlife species at-risk. In fact, according to a new analysis from the American Forest Foundation (AFF), 517 forest-dependent wildlife species are at risk in the southern United States. Of these, 224 are already listed as threatened or endangered, and 293 more are on the candidate or petitioned list for the future.
These species issues can be linked to historical occurrences and present day pressures, such as invasive species, the suppression of natural fire and community expansion, not the forest products industry itself. Contrary to what might be the case in other parts of the globe, in the United States, the forest products industry and wildlife habitat can — and do — successfully coexist. In fact, when you look specifically at family-owned forests of the South, the industry even strengthens conservation. Because of this, brands that depend on wood fiber should look more closely at these forests and find ways to capitalize on this momentum.
Consider this, families and individuals own nearly 60 percent of the forests across the South, more than corporate America or the government. Today, 51 percent of wood fiber removed from forests and flowing into supply chains comes from these small tracts of family-owned land.
Currently, a small but significant percentage of landowners use active management to maintain their forests for the benefit of both wildlife and citizens. And there are opportunities to get more landowners to use these techniques.
Recently, AFF surveyed small forest landowners in the southern United States. Of the respondents, 87 percent stated protecting and improving wildlife habitat was the top reason they owned land. Seventy-two percent already have conducted one or more forest management practices for wildlife such as improving waterways, treating invasives or conducting a prescribed burn, to keep the forests on their property healthy.
What’s better is that 73 percent state they are planning to or want to do more in the future. What is stopping them is an uncertainty about what practices to do, where to find resources and funding to get the work done.
Perhaps most important, the survey shows that harvesting and sustainable management for wildlife are positively correlated. According to the survey, family forest landowners who harvest were more likely (85 percent) to manage for wildlife than those who have not harvested (62 percent).
This is because landowners who harvest or thin are working with foresters and professionals. Therefore, they are getting the knowledge and guidance they need to use best management practices for forest health. They also have a source of income, allowing them to have the needed funding to manage their forests, often for what matters most to them: wildlife.
And there are plenty of examples of success where landowners were able to overcome barriers. Earl and Wanda Barrs have been landowners for more than 30 years. In the 1980s, the Barrs purchased 411 acres and started turning their land into the Gully Branch Tree Farm. Today, they manage 1,500 acres of pine and hardwoods for timber production and have a deep passion for forest conservation.
The Barrs have been successful because they are regularly working with professionals and have had markets for their wood products — ranging from logs to biomass. With ready access to markets for timber, the Barrs have been able to sell their American Tree Farm System-certified sustainable timber every year.
This income has helped the Barrs keep their land in trees and to help the wildlife. They take on additional forest management practices that help species and thus the Barrs’ land hosts red-cockaded woodpeckers, deer, wild turkey and more. Markets help ensure we have stewards of the land, such as the Barrs, that protect biodiversity and safeguard the benefits these forests provide, such as clean water and wildlife habitat.
That said, only 40 percent of landowners in the South have conducted harvesting or thinning activities. The challenge is to get more landowners engaged in a wide variety of active forest management practices to maintain their lands for the benefit of both wildlife and wood.
Fortunately, a growing number of successful, collaborative projects out there are recruiting landowners to do just that.